TL;DR
Get the latest gadgets delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
A federal judge has delayed approving Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement after objections from authors and class members. Concerns focus on excessive legal fees and inadequate author payouts, with ongoing disputes over settlement terms.
A federal judge has declined to approve Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement over allegations of excessive attorney fees and insufficient compensation for authors, delaying the process to review objections and settlement terms.
On Thursday, US District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin declined to rubber-stamp the settlement, citing the need to understand objections from authors and class members. Several objectors, including authors Pierce Story and Ruben Lee, argued that the legal fees requested—more than $320 million—were disproportionate to the individual payouts, which are expected to be around $3,000 per author. Story estimated that if attorney fees were reduced to $70 million, author payouts could increase by nearly 25%. The objections also highlighted concerns that lawyers’ compensation was tied to the full settlement fund, despite many authors not having registered claims. Additionally, some objectors called for stricter measures on how their works were acquired and used by Anthropic, with one demanding the destruction of all copies of their works before settlement approval.
Why It Matters
This development is significant because it challenges what is believed to be the largest copyright settlement in US history, raising questions about fairness in class-action payouts and attorney fees. The delay underscores ongoing tensions over how damages are distributed and the transparency of legal processes in large-scale copyright disputes. For authors and copyright holders, the outcome could influence future settlements and legal standards for fair compensation.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement relates to allegations that the company used copyrighted works without proper authorization to train its AI models. The settlement, announced earlier this year, covers over 480,000 works, with authors expected to receive approximately $3,000 each. Previous approvals by retired Judge William Alsup faced scrutiny over attorney fees, leading to calls for an independent investigation. Objections from authors and class members have increased recently, especially over the fairness of lawyer compensation and the handling of their works.
“Every dollar that Counsel takes from the Settlement fund is one that is not given to those actually harmed.”
— Pierce Story, author and objector
“The recommendation for an independent investigation was not disclosed to the new judge, raising concerns about transparency.”
— Lea Bishop, copyright law professor and objector
“All copies of my works must be destroyed before the settlement can proceed, due to ambiguity over how my works were acquired.”
— James R. Sills, class member and objector
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It is not yet clear whether the judge will approve a revised settlement or impose modifications to address the objections. The final decision remains pending, and the outcome of the upcoming May 21 response deadline is uncertain.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
Authors and class members must respond to objections by May 21. Anthropic will likely submit a brief explaining why late opt-outs should not be honored. The judge will then decide whether to approve the settlement, potentially requiring adjustments to attorney fees or settlement terms.
intellectual property legal guides
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Why is the settlement being delayed?
The settlement is delayed because a federal judge wants to review objections from authors and class members concerning attorney fees and the handling of their works, questioning whether the terms are fair and transparent.
What are the main objections raised?
Objections focus on the excessive legal fees requested by lawyers, the small payouts to authors, and concerns over how their works were acquired and used by Anthropic.
Could the settlement be rejected?
Yes, if the judge finds the objections valid and the settlement terms unfair, she could reject or modify the agreement before final approval.
What happens if the settlement is approved after review?
If approved, the settlement would proceed, with authors receiving their payouts and lawyers receiving their fees, though the process might still involve adjustments based on objections.
What is the significance of this delay?
The delay highlights ongoing concerns about fairness in large-scale copyright settlements and may influence future legal standards for attorney compensation and author protections.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
